Understanding Issue 2: A Closer Look at Arkansas’ Casino Licensing Ballot Proposal for 2024
As the political landscape in Arkansas heats up with the upcoming November 2024 ballot, one issue has sparked significant debate and confusion among residents: Issue 2. This proposal will allow Arkansans to decide on the future of casino licensing in the state. With two opposing groups taking the stage—Local Voters in Charge (LVC), advocating for change, and Investing in Arkansas, opposing it—advertisements from both sides have raised various claims that need scrutiny. To help voters make an informed decision, 5NEWS has conducted fact-checks on some of these assertions.
What is Issue 2?
If passed, Issue 2 would bring transformative changes to Arkansas’ casino licensing process. The amendment seeks to revoke the existing casino license for Pope County and shift the decision-making power regarding future casino licenses from the Arkansas Racing Commission to local voters. This means that any county wishing to legalize a casino would need to hold a countywide election, allowing residents to have a direct say in whether gambling can occur in their locality.
The proposal comes amid ongoing debates about the impact of gambling on local communities and economic development. Supporters argue that the voice of the local citizenry should be primary, whereas opponents express concerns over potential economic losses and job opportunities.
Fact-Checking Claims from Local Voters in Charge
-
Pope County’s 2018 Vote Against a Casino
One of LVC’s prominent claims is that while four casinos have been authorized across the state, only three counties voted in favor. This claim references Pope County’s rejection of Amendment 100 in 2018, which aimed to authorize casinos statewide—local voters in Pope County opposed this initiative by 61%. If Issue 2 passes, it would ensure that counties like Pope that have previously voted against casinos would not have a license awarded without local voter consent.
According to Scott Hardin, the communications director for the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, "Although Pope County did not individually support Amendment 100, its fate was determined on a statewide level, leaving local sentiments unrecognized."
-
Out-of-State Gambling Lobbyists
LVC has also asserted that "out-of-state gambling lobbyists" are pushing for a casino in Pope County. The current license was granted to Cherokee Nation Entertainment (CNE), an entity based in Oklahoma. In contrast, opponents highlight the considerable financial backing for Issue 2 from local interests, notably the Choctaw Casino, which has reportedly contributed over $5 million in support of the proposal. Hardin emphasizes the complex nature of these interests, stating that while out-of-state entities are involved, local dynamics also play a crucial role.
Fact-Checking Claims from Investing in Arkansas
-
Local Support for a Casino
In response to LVC’s claims, Investing in Arkansas highlights that local governance structures, including the Pope County Quorum Court and local mayors, have shown support for the casino project. Judge Ben Cross has noted the quorum court passed a resolution backing CNE’s proposal. As Hardin explains, local officials must demonstrate support to even apply for a casino license through the Arkansas Racing Commission, cementing local political endorsement for the initiative.
-
Economic Benefits from Casino Revenue
One of the cornerstone arguments made by Investing in Arkansas is that casino-generated tax revenue will support essential community needs, including funding for first responders, schools, and infrastructure improvements. Under Amendment 100, casinos are obligated to pay 8% in taxes to their respective counties and an additional 13% on revenues up to $150 million in a year, which proponents argue will significantly benefit local public services.
-
Potential Job Losses and Economic Impact
Conversely, opponents of Issue 2 claim that approving the measure could lead to significant job losses and deter investments. Hardin disputes this assertion, arguing that the proposed casino will generate jobs directly tied to Cherokee Nation Entertainment’s operational and construction workforce. Moreover, he cites a $40 million commitment from CNE to fund initiatives for the county after establishing the casino.
Conclusion
As the November 2024 ballot approaches, Arkansas voters will face a critical decision regarding Issue 2 and its implications for casino licensing in their communities. With claims flying from both proponents and opponents, it’s essential for voters to consider the facts and context surrounding this issue. Understanding the past voting trends, local governance, and economic implications will be crucial as residents head to the polls.
Voter engagement and informed decision-making will shape Arkansas’ future as the state navigates the complex landscape of gambling and local governance. As the debate continues, all eyes will be on the role of citizens in determining how they wish their communities to evolve.
1
20
20
