The Gambling Industry Pushes Back Against Proposed 138% Tax Increase
The UK gambling industry is in an uproar following reports that the government is contemplating a staggering 138% increase in gambling taxes. This potential hike, anticipated to be outlined in the upcoming budget by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on October 30, has sparked widespread concern among industry stakeholders, who argue it misrepresents the sector’s complexities and could inflict significant damage on businesses.
Understanding the Proposed Tax Increases
A report from the Guardian on October 11 indicated that various think tanks are advocating for substantial tax increases on gambling activities. Specifically, proposals include raising the remote gaming duty (RGD) from the current 21% to 50%, and the general betting duty on bookmakers from 15% to 30%. These measures are projected to yield as much as £3 billion ($3.9 billion) for public finances.
Market Reaction and Industry Response
Following the publication of these proposals, shares of major gambling companies such as Flutter, Entain, Evoke, and Rank Group experienced sharp declines. Notably, Entain dropped approximately 15%, reflecting investor anxiety over the implications of such tax hikes.
Industry experts have been vocal in their opposition to the proposed changes. Gambling consultant Steve Donoughue dismissed the news as “bollocks,” criticizing the government’s lack of understanding about how the industry operates. Shadow sport minister Louie French echoed this sentiment, cautioning that sharply increasing taxes could devastate companies’ profits, resulting in closures, job losses, and a subsequent “black hole” in sports funding.
A Controversial IPPR Report Sparks Outrage
Further complicating the situation is the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) report, which many industry advocates have labeled as “Stalinesque.” This report suggests raising taxes on high-harm gambling activities while leaving lower-harm options like the National Lottery unchanged. Critics argue that the proposed recommendations lack substantial evidence of effectiveness and could exacerbate the hardships already faced by vulnerable consumers.
The Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) has also raised alarms about the potential fallout from these tax hikes. The BGC’s chief executive, Grainne Hurst, warned that increasing taxes would not only stifle growth in the sector but could also threaten jobs and disrupt funding for horse racing, a sport heavily reliant on betting revenues.
Expectations for a More Reasonable Approach
Despite these heightened fears, many in the industry remain skeptical about the viability of such extreme tax increases. Consulting company Regulus Partners notes that while a damaging tax raid cannot be fully dismissed, historical trends suggest the treasury is unlikely to pursue such reckless measures. They propose moderate adjustments instead, suggesting that increasing the RGD to a nominal 25% could potentially raise an additional £300 million without causing severe detriment to the industry’s sustainability.
Industry analysts like Alun Bowden from Eilers & Krejcik believe some form of tax increment is inevitable. However, they predict more subdued raises, preserving the competitive nature of UK gambling firms in the broader European context, where tax rates are often higher than the current UK levels.
The Impact on Share Prices
The immediate fallout from the proposed tax changes reflects a volatile market environment. After the initial drop, several companies, including Entain and Playtech, saw a modest recovery in share prices. Despite this, the outlook remains precarious. Evoke, for instance, has suffered a consistent downturn, losing 16% of its value week-to-date.
Investors and stakeholders alike are closely monitoring the situation as they wait for the government’s official announcement on tax policy. While the possibility remains that the government might enact a more balanced approach to taxation within the gambling sector, the whispers of a significant tax increase continue to evoke anxiety within an industry that is navigating an already uncertain regulatory landscape.
Conclusion
As the date of the budget approaches, the tension between safeguarding responsible gambling and ensuring a thriving industry remains a hot topic. Balanced legislative action that acknowledges the complexities of the gambling sector may be the key to preventing detrimental consequences while ensuring that tax revenue does not come at the cost of the industry’s future viability. Stakeholders will have to remain vigilant as they advocate for reasoned policies that support both responsible gambling practices and a healthy, competitive market.
1
20
20
