Missouri Campaigns for and Against Sports Betting: A Battle Heats Up
As the November ballot approaches, Missouri finds itself at the center of a heated debate over a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at legalizing sports betting in the state. The campaign, marked by significant financial contributions and strategic advertising, has taken a dramatic turn with the recent cancellation of over $1 million worth of television ads opposing the measure.
The Cancellation of Advertising: A Tactical Shift
On a pivotal Thursday, the Missourians Against the Deceptive Online Gambling Amendment officially announced the cancellation of television ads valued at approximately $1.2 million. This decision comes as the opposing campaign, which has invested nearly $4 million in advertising efforts, opts to pivot from traditional media to direct grassroots outreach. According to Brooke Foster, a spokeswoman for the opposition, the move reflects a commitment to engaging directly with voters in the weeks leading up to the election.
"While the out-of-state online gambling corporations continue to throw millions of dollars at misleading TV ads, we have decided to focus our efforts on grassroots outreach and community conversations," Foster stated in an email to the Missouri Independent. This strategic reorientation underscores the importance of personal engagement in swaying public opinion, especially during a time when misinformation can easily proliferate.
The Financial Landscape of the Campaigns
The financial stakes in the sports betting debate in Missouri are substantial. The opposing campaign has received significant backing, including $14.2 million from Caesars Entertainment-owned casinos, which are the only ones actively opposing the ballot measure among the six licensed operators in the state. Conversely, the campaign advocating for Amendment 2, named Winning for Missouri Education, has raised a staggering amount—over $15.8 million each from leading sportsbooks like FanDuel and DraftKings. This total makes it the most-funded ballot measure campaign in Missouri history, with advertising costs nearing $10 million to date.
Amidst this financial contest, Jack Cardetti, a spokesperson for Winning for Missouri Education, expressed confidence in their campaign strategy. Although declining to speculate on the motives behind the ad cancellations, he affirmed, “We’re focused on the campaign and making sure our message is getting out. We feel really good about where we are right now.”
The Proposal: What Does Amendment 2 Entail?
If passed, Amendment 2 would not only legalize sports betting but also set the tax rate at 10% for sports wagering in Missouri. The amendment aims to allow professional sports franchises and the state’s 13 casinos to offer both retail and online sports betting services, aligning Missouri with 38 other states and Washington D.C., which have embraced some form of legalized betting.
Recent polling by St. Louis University/YouGov indicates that public sentiment is evolving regarding sports betting; 50% of surveyed voters support the measure, while only 30% express opposition. However, opponents have successfully narrowed the gap with their advertising campaigns, highlighting concerns that resonate with some voters.
According to Foster, the advertisements launched in early September have made a tangible impact, drawing attention to potential drawbacks of the proposed amendment. As Foster noted, “It’s definitely tightened… it’s margin of error type close, so we’re really pleased to see that.”
Competitive Advertising and Engagement Strategies
With the cancellation of traditional advertising by the opposition, both campaigns are intensifying their outreach strategies. Winning for Missouri Education has not only adjusted its advertising budget but is also leveraging partnerships with professional sports teams to bolster its image and garner support.
In contrast, Missourians Against the Deceptive Online Gambling Amendment is focusing on face-to-face interactions. This approach aims to foster community discussions that address voters’ concerns more directly, potentially swaying undecided individuals in the voting populace.
Conclusion: The Road Ahead
The November election is shaping up to be a significant moment in Missouri’s political landscape. Beyond the sports betting measure, voters will also decide on contentious issues such as the state’s abortion ban and minimum wage increases. As both sides ramp up their campaigns, the outcome will hinge not only on the financial resources available but also on voters’ perceptions and the tangible impact of each campaign’s outreach efforts.
With the stakes so high, Missouri residents are poised to play a pivotal role, making their voices heard on issues that could redefine the state’s economic and social landscape for years to come. Whether Amendment 2 will bring sports betting to Missouri or if the opposition will prevail remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the battle for public opinion is far from over.
1
20
20
