The Legal Troubles of Former State Senator Andy Sanborn and His Casino
In the intricate world of legal affairs and corporate ethics, the case of former New Hampshire state Senator Andy Sanborn has emerged as a salient example of the regulatory scrutiny involved in the casino industry. A week following the indictment of Sanborn on pandemic-related fraud charges, the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office took a significant step by filing identical charges against his business, the Concord Casino. This move raises pressing questions about the future of this establishment and its potential impact on the state’s economy.
The Indictments: An Overview
The charges against Sanborn and his casino, officially known as Win Win Win LLC, revolve around allegations of theft by deception and unauthorized taking. According to the indictments, in 2020, the Concord Casino fraudulently obtained almost $190,000 from the Main Street Relief Fund, a federal initiative aimed at providing economic support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prosecutors allege that the casino misrepresented its operational losses to secure a payout of $286,600, far exceeding what it was entitled to.
The implications of these allegations are severe. If convicted, not only would Sanborn face significant legal repercussions, but the Concord Casino would also be barred from holding a gaming license for the next ten years. This prohibition casts doubt on Sanborn’s attempts to sell the casino, which could potentially be doomed if the Attorney General’s Office does not clarify whether such license losses would transfer to a new owner.
Impact on the Casino’s Operations and State Revenue
The Concord Casino holds a historic horse racing license, which allows it to offer slot-like games for at least seven more years. With New Hampshire instituting a moratorium on new gaming licenses to allow the industry to mature, this existing license represents a valuable asset. The revenue generated from historic horse racing significantly exceeds that of traditional table games, with the state having collected around $2.7 million from it in August, contrasted with merely $640,000 from table games that month. This disparity underscores the importance of the casino’s operations not just for Sanborn, but also for the state’s educational funding, which relies heavily on gaming revenue.
With the ongoing legal issues, the Attorney General’s Office has yet to comment publicly on the latest indictment. However, Sanborn’s defense attorney, Zachary Hafer, has voiced concerns over the motivations behind the separate charges against the casino. He suggests that the state may be trying to destabilize the potential sale, benefiting neither taxpayers nor the local community.
The Wider Legal Context
This recent indictment is a continuation of a more extensive investigation that began nearly 14 months ago, wherein the Attorney General’s Office accused Sanborn of misrepresenting his business information to secure nearly $844,000 in Economic Injury Disaster Loans, a form of pandemic relief not intended for casinos. Accusations include luxurious expenditures on race cars and high-end vehicles using funds meant for business aid.
While it appears that Sanborn’s gambling license was initially suspended, a subsequent judge intervened, granting Sanborn additional time to facilitate a sale of the casino amid indications that charitable organizations, which have historically benefitted from the casino’s operations, would suffer without its presence. The casino reportedly contributed around $170,000 to nearly 30 charities in its last operational year.
The Road Ahead: A Critical Arraignment
Sanborn is scheduled for arraignment in Merrimack County Superior Court, where these pressing legal issues are set to unfold. The handling of this case could change the landscape of New Hampshire’s gaming industry, especially with the impending decision regarding his buyer’s gaming license application. Despite Sanborn’s wish to maintain operations and fulfill the obligations attached to the casino, the legal challenges looming over him cast a long shadow.
As the story develops, it is critical to observe the interplay between legal accountability and the operational realities of state-chartered businesses, particularly when public interest and community welfare are at stake. This case is far from over and will likely serve as a benchmark for future regulatory oversight in New Hampshire’s evolving gaming landscape.
1
20
20
