Mexico’s Southeast Gateway Project: A Pipeline to Prosperity or Environmental Harm?
Under the shimmering waters of southeast Mexico, a controversial project is taking shape that promises to reshape the region’s economy while posing a significant challenge to environmental goals. The $4.5 billion Southeast Gateway Project, spearheaded by Canadian firm TC Energy Corp. and Mexico’s state utility, is designed to transport up to 1.3 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily from Texas to the Yucatan Peninsula. Set for completion next year, this pipeline is crucial to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum’s ambitions of economic growth and poverty alleviation in a region where a significant portion of the population lives on less than $16 a day.
Economic Boost with a Catch
The Southeast Gateway Project is more than just a pipeline; it is intended to fuel power plants and bolster a proposed transcontinental rail corridor that could rival the Panama Canal. The Yucatan Peninsula, famed for its pristine beaches and luxury resorts like Cancun and Playa del Carmen, also houses communities that are struggling economically. While the wealthy throng the beaches, over half of the peninsula’s residents are in dire economic straits, making the potential for economic uplift through this pipeline appealing.
Oscar Ocampo, an energy analyst at the Mexican Institute for Competition, underscores the significance of this project: “One of the most critical issues in Southeastern Mexico is access to reliable energy, and this pipeline can start bridging that gap.” However, the initiative carries a sobering revelation — it comes at a time when Mexico is grappling with its commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The reliance on fossil fuels, particularly natural gas, presents a dichotomy for Sheinbaum, who has a history of advocating for environmentally sound policies.
A Dual-Edged Sword for Climate Commitments
The pipeline’s construction raises crucial concerns about Mexico’s commitments under the Paris Agreement, which mandates a 35% reduction in greenhouse gases by 2030. The approximately 715-kilometer pipeline, running near fragile coral reefs, not only establishes a heavy reliance on fossil fuels but also undermines Sheinbaum’s goals of transitioning to renewable energy sources. Her administration has outlined a vision for generating 45% of electricity from emission-free sources by 2030, a significant increase from the current 24%. However, some experts view this aspiration as overly optimistic, describing it as a “pipe dream.”
Despite this ambitious plan to diversify energy generation, the new pipeline and associated gas plants are likely to contribute to increased emissions in the long run. Currently, Mexico accounts for 1.3% of global emissions, with an alarming rise in fuel combustion emissions over the past two decades. For Sheinbaum, a former environmental engineer and co-author of reports for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the balancing act between economic growth and reducing carbon footprints will be pivotal in the years to come.
Infrastructure Overhaul Needed
One of Sheinbaum’s key challenges will be to modernize the outdated power grid, which has suffered from years of underinvestment and is now plagued by seasonal blackouts. Transforming Mexico’s energy landscape may require an investment of up to $50 billion, making it one of the largest infrastructure undertakings in the country’s history. Analysts warn that even if Sheinbaum’s administration succeeds in deploying more renewable energy resources, the existing natural gas infrastructure will likely keep emissions elevated for decades.
Boosting Business and Employment Opportunities
Advocates for the Southeast Gateway Project point to the potential economic benefits. The pipeline could greatly stimulate job creation and help reduce poverty rates in the Yucatan, where nearly 39% of the population lives below the poverty line. Business leaders, like Levy Abraham Macari, president of the Canaco chamber of commerce in Merida, tout the pipeline as a catalyst for economic growth, predicting a GDP boost of 3% in the initial years of operation.
Moreover, the region is already experiencing increasing energy demand, which is projected to rise by nearly 7% annually, outpacing the national average. With heightened interest in nearshoring—bringing manufacturing closer to the US to reduce costs—states like Queretaro and San Luis Potosi have flourished. The expectation is that the Yucatan could follow suit, particularly as energy-intensive industries seek reliable and affordable energy sources.
Environmental Concerns and Opposition
Despite the projected economic benefits, the Southeast Gateway Project has drawn significant scrutiny from environmentalists. Opponents warn that the project could lead to increased emissions in the long run, particularly due to methane leakage, which is far more potent than CO2 in its first decades in the atmosphere. They argue that the pipeline threatens to disrupt local ecosystems, impair Indigenous communities’ livelihoods, and undermine endangered species like sea turtles that rely on the coastal zones.
Environmental activist Pablo Ramirez from Greenpeace Mexico highlights the numerous alleged violations of environmental protocols and public consultation processes, calling the project’s fast-tracked approval process into question. Legal challenges are anticipated from environmental groups, although the prospects for halting the project seem slim.
The Long-Term Vision
TC Energy maintains that it has implemented measures to mitigate methane emissions and protect the local environment. The company has invested heavily in comprehensive environmental assessments to ensure minimal ecological disruption.
For the Yucatan, the Southeast Gateway Project could represent a solution to the "energy trilemma," balancing reliability, affordability, and sustainability. As Leonardo Robles from TC Energy notes, “The solution we have at hand right now is natural gas.” Yet, the long-term implications of this reliance could breathe life into economic prosperity at the cost of Mexico’s sustainability goals.
In the coming years, the success of Sheinbaum’s administration will depend not only on the economic impacts of this pipeline but also on her ability to deliver on her commitment to environmental progress amidst competing demands for growth and energy independence. The outcome of this project will have far-reaching implications, making her leadership one to watch as it unfolds.
1
20
20
